<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">I was unsure how much the grant that I disclosed in<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/368849">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/368849</a> <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">should be mentioned (it is mostly offtopic here and mentioning it everywhere would be <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">spammy) but to explain situation in a bit of detail<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><div style="16px"><div style="16px"><div style="16px">- "it is clearly that the success of what Mateusz is working on is in the end dependent<br></div><div style="16px">on you accepting and merging it" - I will be still paid in case that what I will make will be<br></div><div style="16px">rejected and not included in StreetComplete (obviously, not applicable to cases with<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">broken patches rejected as not working). In such case I would release fork <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">(in case of patches rejected for legitimate reasons it would be done solely to<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">confirm that I actually implemented it but for some unforeseen reason it turned out to be a bad idea).<br></div><div style="16px"><br></div></div><div style="16px"><div style="16px"><div style="16px">- "should be disclosing that Mateusz is being paid to work on your project"<br></div><div style="16px">If anyone should be mentioning this - then it should be me.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">- <a href="https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/361">https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/361</a> was proposed and planned<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">before even idea of the grant appeared and I deliberately focused on ideas that predated grant,<br></div></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">especially for ones that involve some tagging decisions<br></div><div style="16px">Note posting date of<br></div><div style="16px"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:maxweight#Support_for_.22no_weight_limit.22">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:maxweight#Support_for_.22no_weight_limit.22</a><br></div><div style="16px"><br></div></div></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">- selection of things that I planned to do was entirely on my side and with rare exceptions of explicitly<br></div></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">listed tasks (like bypassing of censorship of Overpass Turbo in Russia) I am completely <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">free to change/modify tasks that I am working on. In case of someone else starting their<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">own work or presenting good ideas why things from <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><a href="https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues">https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues</a> should not be implemented<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">I have no problem with changing what will be done.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">I can quote something like<br></div><div style="16px"> <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/368849">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/368849</a> under every posting<br></div><div style="16px">tangentially related to implemented PRs but I am not convinced that it would be a good idea<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">(I even included it in my initial mail draft and deleted it as a spammy self-promotion offtopic to this list).<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">(should I also disclose that mentioning that my work on StreetComplete is sponsored by this<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">grant is encouraged by my grant?)<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">What would you think would be appropriate way of handling this?<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Mention that it is related to a grant and include link to<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/368849">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/368849</a> ?<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Is anything missing in this diary entry?<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Do something else?<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">3 Jul 2019, 13:03 by <a href="mailto:simon@poole.ch">simon@poole.ch</a>:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">Could both of you be a bit more transparent about the situation. You<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">should be disclosing that Mateusz is being paid to work on your project<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">and while not a direct employer-employee relationship, it is clearly<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">that the success of what Mateusz is working on is in the end dependent<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">on you accepting and merging it, and so you are not commenting on just<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">random third party wiki edits.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Am 03.07.2019 um 12:52 schrieb Tobias Zwick:<br></div><blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Reviewed it. That is some impressive work, thank you for this!<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">A few remarks:<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">1. Maxweight<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">1.1 At the examples: for max empty weight, I propose the key maxemptyweight. It suggests itself.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">1.2 At the examples: Conditionals should maybe better be catch-all, so i.e. axles>=3 instead of axles=3<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">2. Maxweightrating:<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">2.1 At the examples, Poland: This sign is actually an access restriction for all HGVs: hgv=no. By definition in EU laws and most other countries, a heavy goods vehicle is a goods vehicle with a GVWR of 3.5t and above. See the wiki page for Key:hgv for a longer explanation.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">3. Maxaxleload mentions that weight in USA must always be given in short tons while the maxweight article also mentions pounds. Same with the article about maxbogieweight.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">4. Maxbogieweight in Romania: I'd say a tri-axle is still a bogie.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Tobias 🌴<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">On July 3, 2019 9:43:12 AM GMT+01:00, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz@tutanota.com> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">There were recently significant changes at OSM Wiki page about<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">maxweight tag<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">and related tags. Review is welcomed.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">See<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight> - major changes<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">included fixing mistakes<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">in examples, adding additional examples, reformatting, documenting how<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">object without max weight<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">sign may be tagged<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweightrating<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweightrating> - page itself<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">is quite new. Recent changes<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">included reformatting and new examples<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxaxleload<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxaxleload> - smaller<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">changes, but for completeness:<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">fixing mistake and additional examples<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Again, review is welcomed!<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">_______________________________________________<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Tagging mailing list<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br></div></blockquote></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div> </body>
</html>