<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">Is it OK to use natural=volcano for remains of volcanoes?<br><br>There is volcano:status=extinct but I feel that tagging <br>volcano-related rocks as volcanoes is a poor idea.<br><br>See <br>https://www.steinmann.uni-bonn.de/institut/bereiche/endogene-prozesse/arbeitsgruppen/strukturgeologie/lehre/aufschluesse-im-rheinland/dachsbusch<br>for a real example (text in German, but images should be clear).<br><br>Triggered by https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1792260#map=18/50.42869/7.23260<br><br>Similar examples include<br>Góra Swiętej Anny / Annaberg<br>https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B3ra_%C5%9Awi%C4%99tej_Anny - <br>https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2241712057/history<br>volcano existed here 27 millions years ago, volcanic cone is fully eroded and<br>the current hill is made of stones formed in the caldera of the volcano.<br><br><br>Wdżar<br>https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wd%C5%BCar<br>https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/726504503/history<br>There are volcanic rocks here, mountains looks like a volcanonic cone, called <br>volcano by some for marketing purposes but there is no reason whatsoever to<br>describe it as volcano.<br></div> </body>
</html>