<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/08/19 09:21, François Lacombe
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG0ygLfee8Z2EMOqkOn_JhOe+qgNJFHSsTqWM=V4asKBuEkB4w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le jeu. 29 août 2019
à 01:01, Graeme Fitzpatrick <<a
href="mailto:graemefitz1@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">graemefitz1@gmail.com</a>>
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I've just had a quick play on TagInfo &
protect_class & protection_title, plus a couple of
others, all refer to protected areas of one type or
another</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Current usage on OSM is clear and I don't question this</div>
<div>This proposal is an opportunity to be sure we're choosing
the most appropriate word regarding what the target is.<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div> How about reserving IP_class or IP_protection?
Would seem to cover it nicely (especially if they're
not actually used!)</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>According to what Paul said, ingress_protection would be
better. ip_protection is redundant (p of protection +
"protection")</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Then we shouldn't have simple protection=* for this
proposal but xxxx_protection too.<br>
</div>
<div>As N of IUCN means Nature, what about nature_protection?<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
+1 for nature_protection. Says what it is? <br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG0ygLfee8Z2EMOqkOn_JhOe+qgNJFHSsTqWM=V4asKBuEkB4w@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le jeu. 29 août 2019
à 01:05, Kevin Kenny <<a
href="mailto:kevin.b.kenny@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">kevin.b.kenny@gmail.com</a>>
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
If people insist, I'd go to 'protected_area:category',
but I consider<br>
that to be rather too verbose, and I'm not sure that
it's worth it to<br>
avoid the minimal risk of namespace pollution.</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Effort is appreciable, but there is no need to
introduce namespace here</div>
<div>Currently I'd be in favour of removing at least
_class or _type suffixes as it doesn't bring additional
information.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Class and type add nothing, don't use them. <br>
</body>
</html>