<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">2 Sep 2019, 03:21 by graemefitz1@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="" dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div></div></div></div></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Sun, 1 Sep 2019 at 21:57, Paul Allen <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com">pla16021@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div class="">I'm fairly happy with flood_probability. There's something nagging at the back of my<br></div><div class="">mind saying I ought to be unhappy with flood_probability, but it's not telling me why.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>How about something like:<br></div><div>flood_potential=100y / 1% + depth=1.2<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">This kind of data is not<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">verifiable and not surveyable by an<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">OSM mapper.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">It is impossible to improve, verify<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">or maintain this.</div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">There is no point in dumping it into OSM,<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">it should stay as a separate dataset.</div> </body>
</html>