<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">2 Sep 2019, 23:20 by graemefitz1@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="" dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div></div></div></div></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 16:38, Mateusz Konieczny <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div>This kind of data is not<br></div><div>verifiable and not surveyable by an<br></div><div>OSM mapper.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The place I'm thinking of, there's a yellow line painted on the wall of the car park, approximately 1.2m high, labelled "1 in 100 year flood level".<br></div><div><br></div><div>To me, that's verifiable & surveyable.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">In this case - it makes sense to map it.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">I reacted this way without specifying <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">"Except in case of explicit signs"<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">as I have never seen something like that<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">and I am aware about multiple<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">(contradictory) studies of food probability<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">for my region.</div> </body>
</html>