<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">9 Sep 2019, 11:46 by janjko@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="">Monaco is a <a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City-state">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City-state</a><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm not convinced. If city-state is a city and a state in one, then why do we have two objects in Openstreetmap? Then it should be one relation with admin_level=2 + place=city<br></div></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Monaco includes for example territorial<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">waters while it is not a part of the city.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">City states may include also other areas<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">that is not a part of the city.</div> </body>
</html>