<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 12.09.2019 um 23:24 schrieb Peter
Elderson:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+uPLbDe5LhO+y43CLCcoVTPxoxe8ZybKP4EHmwnud_hmQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">In NL node networks all node2node routes are route
relations.
<div><br>
<div>Then all the relations and the nodes are added to the
network relation, where the network:type (i.e. the
setup/system/rules), the network name, operator, website etc
are tagged. Currently, the network relation for node
networks is used only for maintenance en checking network
integrity. </div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Oh, thank you for clarifying.
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+uPLbDe5LhO+y43CLCcoVTPxoxe8ZybKP4EHmwnud_hmQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>I think the network in Bremen is a preference route
system. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Sounds about right.<br>
<p>Yours<br>
Hubert87<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+uPLbDe5LhO+y43CLCcoVTPxoxe8ZybKP4EHmwnud_hmQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Vr gr Peter Elderson</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 22:49
schreef Hubert87 via Tagging <<a
href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">To
summarize:<br>
- (highway) Use lcn=yes on the highway; (my Idea) maybe with
some more<br>
Information about the network like lcn:operator=*, lcn:ref=*
or similar.<br>
- (route-relation) split up the network into smaller relations
going<br>
from guidepost to guidepost. Seems very complicated, also to
query/get<br>
the entire network.<br>
- (network-relation) get a new value for network:type=* ,
maybe<br>
guidepost_network.<br>
<br>
I still have a slight preference toward the network-relation.
It seems<br>
very similar to the node-network from NL and imho should be
tagged<br>
comparably.<br>
<br>
However, most import to me is to keep the information about
the network<br>
character somehow. A simple lcn=yes won't do that.<br>
<br>
Yours<br>
Hubert87<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>