<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Similar problems with other features.<br>
<br>
Possibly use a site relation? <br>
<br>
Map each individual parcel as a simple way with the reference.<br>
<br>
Then place each parcel into a site relation and then the common
tags on the site relation.<br>
<br>
Something like that, look up the site relation on the wiki for
details, masy only be a proposal. <br>
<br>
<br>
On 10/10/19 07:04, Leif Rasmussen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADcEzcb5qRxF3GJmJ6Z1nQL=2Hy5-2RvkHQqc9xYv8zzdbt-rw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="auto">I'd go with landuse=forestry on the property, a
tag that was suggested here a while back. This isn't official
or anything, but moving towards tagging forest parcels
differently from the trees seems important.</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 3:32 PM
Mateusz Konieczny <<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>9 Oct 2019, 18:11 by <a href="mailto:penegal@live.fr"
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">penegal@live.fr</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left:1px solid
#93a3b8;padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px">
<div>Hello, there.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My question is simple: how do we tag such things? The
boundary=forest_compartment relation is not rendered,
and what is rendered is tagging as landuse=forest both
the forest and its parcels, which leads to rendering it
twice, as you can see here: <a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6086515"
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6086515</a>
Besides, such forest are often mistagged for the
renderer: as the contributor wants the parcel number
rendered, he puts it in the name tag, not in the ref
tag, to which I assume it should belong.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So, is there an "official"/recommended/widespread way
to tag forest parcels, their number and them belonging
to a forest?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>boundary=forest_compartment?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is there anything wrong with this tagging<br>
</div>
<div>scheme (except that mapping this<br>
</div>
<div>kind of info seems a bit dubious to me).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>All problems that you mention are<br>
</div>
<div>about tagging for renderer.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>