<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 14/10/19 18:28, Peter Elderson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+sCU0PDBAenYqbjU7jW5ZTguKFVWBrej_b9yBU66Lnh-w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">brad:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> There are several variations and gpx
tracks available on the net for the great divide route.
There are also many websites which discuss the route and
show maps. It's in the public domain.<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I've looked at the info for the Great Divide MTB-trail
without any prior knowledge. </div>
<div>On the one hand I think, if there's nothing on de ground
don't map it. </div>
<div>On the other hand, if it's a fixed and well kept trail
known to all, I imagine mtb maps showing all kinds of
mtb-trails except The Big One that everybody knows. If I
were an MTB'ist, I would probably disxcard OSM as unusable,
because it doesn't even give the biggest MTB-route on the
planet!</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
If you ask local where it is a fair proportion would direct you to
it?
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>