<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
No.<br>
<br>
Just because, once again, routing software fails & you don't use
a certain tag it is not a reason to deprecate. The tail does not wag
the dog in OSM.<br>
<br>
Contact the navigation software developers & tell them to write
some decent code.<br>
<br>
DaveF<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 23/10/2019 09:26, Florian Lohoff
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:20191023082645.b4nghc3mzqrd4bsd@pax.zz.de">
<pre wrap="">
Hi,
i just saw a changeset of someone makeing a mini_roundabout
from a junction=roundabout. I have never used mini_roundabout
as non of the routing/nav engines i tried actually supported it
when i did.
Instead of making it some special type of roundabout with seperate
tagging i'd vote for deprecating the mini_roundabout and adding
a tag making the area of the junction=roundabout be an area which is
driveable. e.g. why not area=yes on the junction=roundabout.
That would add a lot of information - e.g. the size of the roundabout
etc - and it would eliminate another "special" case which is mostly
unsupported.
Flo
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>