<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 19:25, Martin Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Mi., 23. Okt. 2019 um 12:03 Uhr schrieb Robert Skedgell <<a href="mailto:rob@hubris.org.uk" target="_blank">rob@hubris.org.uk</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I wonder whether it would be worth adding a swimming=* access tag to the<br>
wiki and the list under "Water-based transportation" section of the page<br>
for access=* (alongside boat=*/canoe=*)? <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I am not opposed to the term "swimming", or using it as an access value (there are ~400 uses of it, and although "natural" is the second most used value, it isn't significant in absolute numbers),</div><div>but putting it under "water based transportation" seems odd. Is swimming a kind of "transportation"?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes that's where I would expect it. It's a mode applicable to water or waterways, just like a powered vessel, non-powered vessel, you could have no vessel at all (ie. swimming).</div></div></div>