<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/11/2019 11:20, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CABPTjTDYZtTpeNm8URx_=3ijRxa5YBKh+SCaDO3R-Ah2iQAE+w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Di., 12. Nov. 2019 um
11:49 Uhr schrieb Dave F via Tagging <<a
href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
Is OSM-Carto fit to be promoted as OSM's flagship, de-facto
rendering?<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Dave, I find it extremely unfair to write this explicitly
to Joseph, because he is one of the very active contributors
to OSM-carto at the moment and has tackled a lot of issues.<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed - as has been said many times before, you can't have one
map style that "looks nice", "shows everything" and "works
everywhere".</p>
<p>OSM Carto is one map style that by definition is a compromise.
Other map styles are available, at least one of which that I can
think of (mine) addresses the issues that you have raised - but
does so by making different compromses - it fails elsewhere in the
world and for other target usage, so it simply isn't suitable as
an "everywhere in the world" style.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Andy</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>