<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">12 Nov 2019, 11:47 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">We are (almost) all volunteers, Joseph. It's irritating that this claim is repeatedly rolled out as an excuse.<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">You are not entitled to map renderer focusing issues that you consider important.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">You have no right to demand that other will spend their free time on something just because it<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">is important to you.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">In exactly the same way as I have no right to demand that you will make trip to Kraków, Poland<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">to map bicycle parkings there.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">I'm increasingly disappointed my *voluntary* contributions to the OSM database are are not being fairly or accurately being represented by OSM-Carto due to errors in the programming. It's ridiculous these errors (many of the 400 open issues) can't be fixed "for many years".<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">FYI:<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">- any serious softawe project has many open issues, often for many years<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">- improving OSM Carto is not mandatory for anyone<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">- this kind of hostile and entitled comments are discouraging participation, especially for new<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">potential developers<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">Is OSM-Carto fit to be promoted as OSM's flagship, de-facto rendering?<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Feel free to make a better one.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">Please get back to me when OSM-Carto has a valid reason for not rendering disused bridges.<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">Done already.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">OSM Carto renders bridges tagged with man_made=bridge (and bridges on railway=disused).<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">(at least thanks to this part I can pretend that this is not 100% offtopic)<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">----<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">To repeat: you are entitled to some things but "other people will consider my desires in topic of<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"> OSM map render as the most important thing in their life" is not a human right.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">If you want to encourage other to work on OSM Carto map style (or other map style) then<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">I would recommend to avoid hostile, entitled complaints for a start.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">----<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">And if someone wonders why iD developers deeply dislike mailing lists - probably this<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">kind of comments is justified part of it.<br></div> </body>
</html>