<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/12/19 10:44, Peter Elderson
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+vyj_s27vvhZLMTJh4tEQA42o54hB4bAAd4ir1QieGHsA@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="ltr">Ok, just asking to make sure.</div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    As an overview most hiking things are on
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking</a><br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+vyj_s27vvhZLMTJh4tEQA42o54hB4bAAd4ir1QieGHsA@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div><br>
          <div>
            <div>Could you envision a node passed by two hikes, and
              being a checkpoint for the one and nothing special for the
              other?</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Yes. <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+vyj_s27vvhZLMTJh4tEQA42o54hB4bAAd4ir1QieGHsA@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Would a checkpoint need to be a node of a way in the
              relation? <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    If it only relates only to that relation then quite possibly. <br>
    <br>
    If it is a required activity for that route then I would think so.
    This would link it to the operator, route name etc, possibly
    minimising the work of mappers and reducing errors? <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+vyj_s27vvhZLMTJh4tEQA42o54hB4bAAd4ir1QieGHsA@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
                  data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Vr gr Peter Elderson</div>
              </div>
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Op ma 9 dec. 2019 om 00:16
          schreef Kevin Kenny <<a
            href="mailto:kevin.b.kenny@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">kevin.b.kenny@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
          Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 6:10 PM Peter Elderson <<a
            href="mailto:pelderson@gmail.com" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">pelderson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
          > Is a checkpoint a feature in itself?<br>
          <br>
          Of  course it is. A way segment is also a feature in itself,
          which<br>
          doesn't mean that it can't or shouldn't be part of a route
          relation:<br>
          "When you're hiking this route, you'll need to sign in at
          these<br>
          points."</blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:checkpoint">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:checkpoint</a><br>
  </body>
</html>