<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div>oneway:foot=-1 would still work<br></div><div>(Like oneway=-1 is very rarely needed <br></div><div>for traffic allowed only in direction<br></div><div>opposite to way direction)</div><div><br></div><div>13 Jan 2020, 15:43 by kevin.b.kenny@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 8:21 AM Paul Allen <pla16021@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>Not very intuitive but, perhaps in rare cases, necessary. What if the road is<br></div><div>one-way to both vehicles and pedestrians but vehicles go from A to B whilst<br></div><div>pedestrians go from B to A?<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You beat me to it!<br></div><div><br></div><div>I know I've seen a footway on the verge of the roadway signed, 'WALK<br></div><div>ON LEFT, FACING TRAFFIC.' If the road was a dual-carriageway (it might<br></div><div>have been, I don't recall now), then we'd have had exactly that<br></div><div>situation. "Just reverse the way" isn't a solution when it's forward<br></div><div>for one mode and backward for another.<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin<br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Tagging mailing list<br></div><div>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br></div></blockquote> </body>
</html>