<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>On 1/13/2020 9:46 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALQ-OR5x8FKHHQE+jNyJXFNAHXxaghaBSLj-Q4oxmg74GyqxYg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Personally, I have no
problem with oneway=yes having different<br>
implications depending on the value of the highway key. In
general I<br>
would expect the oneway value to align the predominant use
of the<br>
highway in question.<br>
<br>
More specifically:<br>
<br>
- I would expect a oneway=yes tag to apply to foot traffic
on footway.<br>
</blockquote>
<div>No. There are thousands of footways with
bicycle=yes|official|designated to make them mixed
foot-cycleways</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Sure, there are many footways with allowance for an extra sort of
traffic, most commonly bicycles. If these footways are tagged
oneway=yes, I'd expect the other kinds of traffic to follow that
rule too, unless overridden with e.g. oneway:bicycle=no.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALQ-OR5x8FKHHQE+jNyJXFNAHXxaghaBSLj-Q4oxmg74GyqxYg@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
- I would also expect a oneway=yes tag to apply to foot
traffic on<br>
pedestrian, path, and cycleway -- unless explicitly
nullified with a<br>
oneway:foot=no tag.<br>
</blockquote>
<div> No. There are thousands of pedestrain, path, cycleway
with bicycle=yes|official|designated to make them mixed
foot-cycleways <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't understand the "No." Nothing I wrote precludes using
these ways for both foot and bicycle traffic. <br>
</p>
<p>Cycleways are primarily for bicycles, so I'd expect a oneway tag
on a cycleway to primarily describe the bicycle traffic. If foot
traffic is also permitted on a oneway cycleway, I'd expect it to
follow the same oneway rule, unless explicitly overridden with a
oneway:foot tag.</p>
<p>Pedestrian and path are a little more ambiguous, but again, I'd
expect the oneway tag to apply to whatever the predominant traffic
is. And if tagged oneway, I'd expect that oneway restriction to
apply to foot traffic unless overridden with a oneway:foot tag.<br>
</p>
<p>I'm not *advocating* for this to be a rule -- I'm just describing
how I'm accustomed to interpreting the existing tags. As we know,
the documentation is imperfect. If there's a better way of doing
this, great! Let's document it.</p>
<p>J<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALQ-OR5x8FKHHQE+jNyJXFNAHXxaghaBSLj-Q4oxmg74GyqxYg@mail.gmail.com"></blockquote>
</body>
</html>