<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>13 Jan 2020, 10:42 by colin.smale@xs4all.nl:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>How about free_water=yes if it is available to anybody, and free_water=customers if it is only available to paying customers?<br></p></blockquote><div>+1 <br></div><div><br></div><div>And free_water=no for explicit tagging of not providing a free water.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>I assume this could actually apply to all manner of objects, including pubs, bus stations, town squares... If so, there is no need to reference amenity=cafe etc in the tagging standards, other than as a non-normative illustration or example.<br></div></div></blockquote><div>Though I am unsure whatever tagging town square with mapped<br></div><div>amenity=drinking_water is a good idea.<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>Referencing carafe is not a good plan; firstly that is the container, not the contents and this proposal is about the contents. Secondly, many other things are frequently served in carafes, such as wine. So free_carafe=yes may end up disappointing a few people...<br></div></div></blockquote><div>And water is not always served in a carafe. <br></div><div><br></div><div>And as bonus this tag is significantly less clear in meaning (even "carafe" word<br></div><div>is among rare ones, more likely to be unknown).<br></div> </body>
</html>