<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>16 Jan 2020, 23:36 by 61sundowner@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div class="">On 17/1/20 2:48 am, Paul Allen wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:55, Mateusz Konieczny
<<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>>
wrote:<br></div><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div><br></div><div>16 Jan 2020, 02:22 by <a target="_blank" href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid
rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px"><p>If the 'standard map' starts rendering 'disused=yes'
the same way as 'disused:*=*' (presently not rendered)
then what? <br></p></blockquote><div>Then standard map style will be fixed to<br></div><div>remove this bug.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I took Warin's question to mean what would happen if
standard carto<br></div><div>deliberately chose to handle disused=yes the same way as<br></div><div>disused:*=*. Therefore not a bug to be fixed, but an
intentional<br></div><div>permanent change to behaviour.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If that happened, I would stop marking physical objects
as disused. <br></div></div></div></blockquote><p><br></p><p>And that is a problem. A reduction in information caused by a
render failing to render information. <br></p></blockquote><div>Note that problem is 100% theorethical and it is not happening.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And as far as I can influence it - that will not happen.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>If the render were to render disused:* then I think all would be
happy?<br></p></blockquote><div>No.<br></div><div><br></div><div>For disused:building=*<br>(1) it duplicates (attempts to replace) an existing tagging scheme<br>(2) for building tagging it is not an improvement in any way<br>(3) using it breaks basically all data consumers<br>(4) AFAIK there is no clear agreement that it is a good idea</div><div><br></div><div>For disused:* it is frankly horrible idea.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Rendering disused shops, churches and other disused:amenity, disused:leisure<br></div><div>like actually active ones sounds like a terrible mistake.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And anyway rendering discussions are offtopic here (I will try to stop myself from further<br></div><div>comments specifically about rendering).<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>PS the reason I prefer disused:* is that the scheme is well
documented, logical extensions and appeals to me. <br></p></blockquote><div>I dislike disused:building because it is not logical, not backward compatible, <br></div><div>using it breaks all current actually used data consumers, adds no useful info,<br></div><div>attempted to replace existing tagging by wikifiddling without proposal,<br></div><div>used less often than the standard solution.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And is not appealing to me because I am an obnoxious conservative anarchist<br></div><div>who dislikes changing things without a good reason.<br></div> </body>
</html>