<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Alesandro,</div><div><br></div><div>The thing is that disabled=designated is an access (so regulated by law), and would depend because each country's law vary (not every country enforce restriction for disabled parking or other type of vehicle...). Thus, it may be wrong to tag an access when it doesn't exist. While a tag that's only an attribute describing what type of parking exist, is unambiguous. It may be parking_space=* or access:*=* , both are "good" for that as they are unambiguous in their meaning. The only advantage of the second is that it is already used for amenity=parking and seems coherent to use for the parking_space in my opinion (even if it is only 1 place). The wiki page already mention all the different type because there are many other than disabled (like parent, women, electric charging,...) : <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:capacity">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:capacity</a></div></div><div><br></div>marc, <div><br></div><div>The capacity:*=* tag should not be used alone (as described for any parking), it is an addition to the capacity=* tag. For example, a place marked as "capacity=1" and "capacity:disabled=1" means that the 1 capacity is disabled. A better example is for an amenity=parking, you have a parking with "capacity=12" and "capacity:disabled=3" it means 3 of the 12 parking space are disabled. </div><div>Theoretically, all parking_space should be capacity=1 (and if necessary capacity:*=*) but the advantage (as mentioned above) is that it would use the same tagging than for amenity=parking. Thus we wouldn't use two different scheme for the same thing. </div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le ven. 17 janv. 2020 à 09:52, PanierAvide <<a href="mailto:panieravide@riseup.net">panieravide@riseup.net</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Hello Lionel,</p>
<p>I totally agree with that, I never understood this special
treatment of amenity=parking_space, and so I'm using capacity:*=*
with that. My use case is for disabled people parking spaces :
just look for capacity:disabled=* and you're good to go, whatever
it is a parking or parking_space.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br>
</p>
<pre cols="72">Adrien P.</pre>
<div>Le 17/01/2020 à 09:36, Lionel Giard a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hello everyone,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I saw that on the parking_space wiki page it says that we
shouldn't use capacity:*=* on parking_space, and instead use
the access tag. But why is this the case? It seems logical to
use capacity:disabled=* on a parking_space for disabled people
or capacity:charging=* on a parking_space for electric
vehicles that are charging. And there is not always legal
access linked to these "special" parking spaces (e.g. I don't
think there are many places regulating parking on parents'
parking spaces in the law). <br>
</div>
<div>It seems strange to forbid this, while promoting the
tagging of "capacity=*". ^_^</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I therefore propose to change this description to favour
this tagging (when useful) instead of prohibiting it. What do
you think about this?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Kind Regards,</div>
<div>Lionel</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>