<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">The wiki page for drinking fountain suggests they may be supplied by free flowing water or by a tap. <div><br></div><div>What cases are you referring to? <br><div><br><div dir="ltr">Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 6 Feb 2020, at 17:04, Paul Allen <pla16021@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 15:50, European Water Project <<a href="mailto:europeanwaterproject@gmail.com">europeanwaterproject@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I also agree that removing amenity=drinking_water as a tag makes sense. The physical attributes of a node/way still exists - irrespective of whether the water is drinking quality. For example, a spring which has water polluted after a big storm, stays a spring. </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>How are you going to handle an amenity=drinking_water that is a tap? It's not</div><div>a fountain (ornamental or otherwise). It's not a spring.</div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Paul</div><div><br></div></div></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Tagging mailing list</span><br><span>Tagging@openstreetmap.org</span><br><span>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</span><br></div></blockquote></div></div></body></html>