<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Feb 12, 2020, 12:51 by witwall3@disroot.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:14:54AM +0000, Philip Barnes wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>On Tuesday, 11 February 2020, Volker Schmidt wrote:<br></div><div>> OK, you confirm that the "paved is implied" statement in the wiki page is<br></div><div>> to be read as "assuming we are in Germany ... paved is implied" and is not<br></div><div>> referring to some wiki page that I have not yet detected (that was my<br></div><div>> question).<br></div><div>> <br></div><div>In the UK too paved is implied, I have never used paved. Surface tags such as asphalt, setts, concrete add the detail of what sort of paved.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1. Some of the Amazon people do seem to be adding unnecessary and<br></div><div>unsurveyed surface=asphalt tags to many roads in the UK which I find<br></div><div>quite irritating.<br></div></blockquote><div>Have you tried commenting on their changesets?<br></div><div><br></div><div>If problem of such systematic damage continues - have you tried contacting DWG?<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>