<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mar 1, 2020, 20:03 by victor@tuxayo.net:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On 20-02-25 15:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>In this case I would either remove url or change url to other valid<br></div><div>wdycf value. And I would probably request blocking such user by DWG.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Were they contacted and did they shown no good faith to change their mapping way?<br></div></blockquote><div>Note that this is 100% theoretical situation.<br></div><div><br></div><div>For less theoretical things - I am currently going through OSM links and removing all<br></div><div>fbclid, gclid, campaign_ref, mc_id, utm_source, utm_medium, utm_term, utm_content<br></div><div>and utm_campaign parameters.<br></div><div><br></div><div>There is about 1100 object with this tracking parameters, once I feel confident with my<br></div><div>script (currently used with manual review of every single edit) I may propose running it<br></div><div>in fully automated mode.<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>