<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Op 5 mrt. 2020 om 23:18 heeft Warin <61sundowner@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:<br><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/3/20 1:27 am, Peter Elderson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAKf=P+shCjv=n-QP4=dDxgkfKZVzZN8VG75x_5EMeSpf07hVWQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">Do you know trails with detached sections? We have
some in Nederland, on the islands. Doesn't fit in the proposed
role scheme, I think.</div></blockquote>
<p>How would you get to these 'detached sections"? <br>
</p>
<p>If by ferry, would not the ferry trip form part of the route?</p></div></blockquote><div>Ferry or private boat, and maybe a short walk or bus to the starting point. However, the approach is not waymarked nor described as part of the route. I think this one is more like a collection of separate walks under one name, marketed as one trail with one paper guide. Oops, I may have woken up a sleeping dog there... the "a relation is not a collection" lobby...</div><div><br></div><div>Another trail really has a detached loop, described and waymarked as part of the main route while the connecting bit is not waymarked. I think probably waymarking is not allowed in part of the area and there is no way around it. </div><div>Peter Elderson</div></body></html>