<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/3/20 6:01 am, brad wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7dd7c48b-e826-4d3c-4f85-70291b33b163@fastmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
On 3/14/20 9:47 PM, Warin wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:153e44d2-2103-3817-a6df-ad27663ff7c1@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<pre><tt>Hi,</tt></pre>
<pre><tt>
</tt></pre>
<pre><tt>The present description of landuse=meadow is;</tt></pre>
<pre><tt>
</tt></pre>
<pre>An area of meadow or pasture: land primarily vegetated by grass and other non-woody plants, mainly used for hay or grazing.</pre>
<pre>That places the land cover before the land use. The emphases should be on the land use, the land use should be first?
</pre>
<pre>Possibly a better description:
</pre>
<pre>An area of meadow or pasture: land primarily used to produce hay or for grazing of animals. Usually vegetated by grass and other non-woody plants.
I am trying to get mappers not to use this for areas of grass land that could be more appropriatly tagged natural=grassland.
Thoughts?
</pre>
<br>
</blockquote>
I disagree. Perhaps a regional definition? I think meadow is the
land cover, pasture is the land use <br>
This would match my definition:<br>
Meadow: "a field with grass and often wild flowers in it: "<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/meadow"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/meadow</a><br>
or <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/meadow"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/meadow</a><br>
"A meadow is a field which has grass and flowers growing in it. "<br>
<br>
Locally, (Colorado, USA), we might call a grassy area high in the
mountains an alpine meadow, and it may not have any domesticated
animals grazing it.<br>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Is that not the tag natural=grassland? The tag natural=grassland
is for a land cover of grass .. I think that is what you want. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The key' landuse' should not be used for land cover, so
landuse=meadow should not be used for any land cover. <br>
</p>
<p>The presence of grass is an indication that the land use of
grazing or cropping of hay might, just might take place. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:7dd7c48b-e826-4d3c-4f85-70291b33b163@fastmail.com"> <br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/14/20 11:46 PM, Warin wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:89b93021-e0b3-743c-1838-4e23e1a5fe01@gmail.com">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/3/20 4:36 pm, Joseph
Eisenberg wrote:<br>
</div>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP_2vPjPp2oVZoAz54RQYMvk1YOs-u6T4nbOP0rm_A9NEf0xAw@mail.gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">The presence of mainly grass (or sedges, clover, other herbaceous
plants) is just as important as the presence of grazing or occasional
hay-cutting, to define a meadow or pasture.</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>The grass is not there once cut, the remains are stubble. Hence the word 'usually' can be employed?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Minor point, but I think most grasses are perennial, so it's still
there even if its cut.<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>