<html><head></head><body>Agreed, public transport is certainly the exception here. <br>Yves<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 31 mars 2020 04:21:25 GMT+02:00, Gegorian Hauser <grenhauser@mail.com> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>Hello,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>iD giving a message about all types of aerialway tations to add there the public transport tagging.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>For me the public transport tagging should not be addet to a winter sport aerialway.</div>
<div>Winter sport areas main function it to having fun and not to transport people.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Also iD is giving these function on goods they in the most cases are not allowed for people to access.</div>
<div>The most aerialways are used for winter sports(zip line for fun) and only some smal ammount of gondola/cable_car/chair_lift etc. are used only for public transport.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>There are over 15000 aerialway stations in Europe and over 1000 are just tagged also with public_transport</div>
<div> </div>
<div>For me these combination is in the most situations wrong and for this iD should not have this "fixing" function.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Maybe I am wrong with this, but if we add public_transport to winter sports we should also add public_transport to escalators, moving walkways, elevators, amusement ride, alpine slide etc.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>regards</div>
<div>Gregor</div></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>