<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>Hi,</div>
<div>oh sorry you are confused. Maybe it's too much text I think. But your conclusion is completely correct, yes.</div>
<div>
<div>
<div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Montag, 13. April 2020 um 13:47 Uhr<br/>
<b>Von:</b> "Andrew Davidson" <theswavu@gmail.com><br/>
<b>An:</b> "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org><br/>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand</div>
<div name="quoted-content">
<div>
<div>I'm a bit confused by your proposal, but it would seem to me that what you want to do is add crossing_on_demand to the list of values for the key traffic_signals. Is this correct?</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:10 PM <<a href="mailto:Lukas-458@web.de" onclick="parent.window.location.href='mailto:Lukas-458@web.de'; return false;" target="_blank">Lukas-458@web.de</a>> wrote:</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.8ex;border-left: 1.0px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left: 1.0ex;">
<div>
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>Hi people,</div>
<div>I made a proposal to reform the tagging of those traffic signals, which do only control a crossing. The proposal has two main messages: First that crossing=traffic_signals is every time a strict under-tag of highway=crossing and should not be used on the same node with highway=traffic_signals, because it makes the scheme of how we tag crossings (on nodes) inconsistent. The second is that it wants to add the value traffic_signals=crossing_on_demand as an under-tag of highway=traffic_signals, to mark for the lane-traffic that there is a traffic-signals-node whch does only control an "on demand" crossing. These sets of lane traffic signals often miss a green light because most of the time there is "default green". Also it would fit into the traffic_signals=* tagging scheme for specifying the "type" of a traffic signal.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The link to the proposal is here: <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals%3Dcrossing_on_demand" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals%3Dcrossing_on_demand</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>I'm looking forward to your comments. Please (also) comment on the proposal's discussion page.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Yours, Lukas</div>
<div>User Lukas458</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br/>
Tagging mailing list<br/>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" onclick="parent.window.location.href='mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org'; return false;" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br/>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a></blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>