<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
Às 10:15 de 14/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOJv4R4gEpHZd14b6K0+G_NkdJzDRzVH7_jw1D4d+c=HCQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 04:33, António Madeira via
Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>
wrote:</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>- is <tt dir="ltr" style="background:rgb(238,238,255)
none repeat scroll 0% 0%;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6">ref:xxx=*</tt>
a good solution to add the official reference code/number?</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No. But that's what we have. With hindsight we'd have
done it differently. But</div>
<div>it's now been used so often it would be very difficult to
fix all the existing uses.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>More importantly, heritage/historic tagging was started
by the Historic Place</div>
<div>project and they're the only ones (that I know of) that
make use of those tags.</div>
<div>They're the ones you'd have to convince to alter their
code to handle your</div>
<div>proposed change.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You mean this?<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOJv4R4gEpHZd14b6K0+G_NkdJzDRzVH7_jw1D4d+c=HCQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div> - we've adopted the tag <tt dir="ltr"
style="background:rgb(238,238,255) none repeat scroll 0%
0%;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6">protection_title=*</tt>
to define the protection category of the heritage,
although the German wiki clearly states this is used for
natural areas only. Would it be better to create another
tag or is OK to adapt this one, since this is also a
protected feature?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>It's a protected feature but not a protected natural
area. The wiki page</div>
<div> for it says it requires boundary=national_park or
boundary=protected_area so</div>
<div> it shouldn't be used this way. That said, other people
have used it that way.<br>
</div>
Would xxx:criteria fit your usage?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The "problem" with criteria is that it seems to be used with numbers
or abbreviations, like a list that corresponds to some longer
definitions.<br>
For example: we could create a criteria list with 1, 2, 3, 4 which
would correspond to the 4 levels of heritage existing in Portugal,
but how would data consumers know what those numbers mean? Or if you
use abbreviations, like MN, IIP, etc. we would have the same
problem.<br>
The <tt dir="ltr" style="background:rgb(238,238,255) none repeat
scroll 0% 0%;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6">protection_title=*</tt>
seemed to solve that, but it's not 100% accurate. <br>
I don't want to use it if it's not correct, so maybe we could create
something like <tt dir="ltr" style="background:rgb(238,238,255)
none repeat scroll 0% 0%;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6">heritage:designation=*</tt>
which would go in line with the heritage scheme.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>