<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Thanks Martin, yes, refugee sites should always be temporary even if, as you said, some turn to be very long term places. That's why we do not suggest to add temporary/permanent options.
</div>
<div>
Manon
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
Le 15 avril 2020 à 11:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <
<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
sent from a phone
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 15. Apr 2020, at 01:13, Warin <
<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
I would think amenity=refugee_site is an area set aside for the non-temporary residential use of refugees
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
maybe I’m a dreamer, but I would expect all refugee related features to be “temporary”, even if we are talking about relatively long periods of time
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Cheers Martin
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>