<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>May 13, 2020, 17:43 by jmapb@gmx.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>On 5/13/2020 10:12 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:<br></p><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div><br></div><div>We've had relations for over a decade now, IIRC. It's
time to stop treating this basic primitive as
entity-non-grata. If tools <i>still</i> can't deal with
this, this is on the tools and their developers now.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Sure. Regarding the original question -- in what circumstances are
single-member walking/hiking/biking route relations a good mapping
practice -- what would be your answer?<br></div></blockquote><div>Always.<br></div><div>(a) for consistency.<br></div><div>(b) because in case of splitting this single way it will be not result in problems with relation<br></div> </body>
</html>