<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>On 2020-05-14 14:07, Paul Allen wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 12:58, Martin Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; padding-left: 1ex;">> On 14. May 2020, at 13:16, Paul Allen <<a href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com">pla16021@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br /> > <br /> > It makes it more difficult to the extent that a decision has to be made as to<br /> > whether we treat the NHS in the UK as a whole as admin level 1 or NHS Wales<br /> > as admin level 1. Or some other hierarchical arrangement. Or not bother<br /> > mapping it.<br /><br /><br /> level 1 is improbable because level 2 is the national level.</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Increment my numbers, then.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div> </div>
<div>Anyway, getting back to the original subject... Should these NHS area boundaries be tagged as "boundary=administrative" or something else like "boundary=state_healthcare"? They are obviously used for some kind of administration, but my vote would be for the latter.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>