<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/14/2020 10:01 AM, Paul Johnson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMPM96oqM5pGbO0_ccsOrv1RjxpAAR8=w+za8EQ7x3Q0gkBFkA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 5:48
AM Steve Doerr <<a href="mailto:doerr.stephen@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">doerr.stephen@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>On 14/05/2020 09:31, Jo wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="auto">
<div><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, May 13,
2020, 17:44 Jmapb <<a
href="mailto:jmapb@gmx.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">jmapb@gmx.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>Regarding the original question -- in what
circumstances are single-member
walking/hiking/biking route relations a good
mapping practice -- what would be your answer?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Always</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Doesn't that violate <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element</a>
?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No. The route traverses the way, it's not the way. </div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Okay. But surely this doesn't mean that every named footway or
path should be part of a route relation. <br>
</p>
<p>The bike trail that brad linked to, <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6632400">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6632400</a>
-- I've never been there but I don't offhand see any reason to
call it a route. (Brad has been there, I assume, because it looks
like he updated it 2 days ago.) There's no information in the
relation tags that isn't also on the way itself. Is there any
benefit to creating a route relation in cases like this?</p>
J<br>
</body>
</html>