<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 5:48 AM Steve Doerr <<a href="mailto:doerr.stephen@gmail.com">doerr.stephen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div>
    <div>On 14/05/2020 09:31, Jo wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="auto">
        <div><br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, May 13, 2020,
              17:44 Jmapb <<a href="mailto:jmapb@gmx.com" target="_blank">jmapb@gmx.com</a>> wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              <div>Regarding the original question -- in what
                circumstances are single-member walking/hiking/biking
                route relations a good mapping practice -- what would be
                your answer?<br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">Always</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Doesn't that violate
    <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element</a> ?<br>
    </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No.  The route traverses the way, it's not the way.  You know what does violate one feature, one element?  Putting highway route numbers on the way instead of exclusively in the relation. </div></div></div>