<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>May 15, 2020, 08:28 by s8evqq@runbox.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On Fri, 15 May 2020 01:53:37 +0200 (CEST), Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>Not sure is it the best place (someone again decided to go crazy with templates), but<br></div><div>I made<br></div><div>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ATagging_scheme_for_hiking_and_foot_route_relations&type=revision&diff=1991147&oldid=1988978<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hey, what's so crazy about this :) :). We discussed the hiking/foot route relation overhaul a while ago and in the end, 2 people suggested a template might be the best way to have the information consistently on multiple pages.<br></div></blockquote><div>OK, this one is not so bad after looking at it again.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Still, I it was quite tricky to check whatever I am not <br></div><div>duplicating content ("What links here" is your help)<br></div><div>and I am still not 100% sure that I have not missed anything.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Thanks for the edit by the way. I think it fits there perfectly.<br></div></blockquote><div>Glad that it improved description!<br></div><div><br></div><div>BTW, I remember proposal about named roles and<br></div><div>that some people stuff signposts into route relations.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I do neither, and I have not checked whatever it is popular<br></div><div>and worth documenting.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Feel free to mention that if necessary!<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>