<html dir="ltr"><head></head><body style="text-align:left; direction:ltr;" bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#2e3436" link="#1b6acb" vlink="#2e3436"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>I was busy and couldn't participate in this very interesting discussion.</div><div><br></div><div>My proposal:</div><div>- Moving all social media keys like `facebook`, `twitter`, `whatsapp`, `telegram` etc. to a `socialmedia` namespace like `socialmedia:facebook`, `socialmedia:twitter`, `socialmedia:whatsapp`, `socialmedia:telegram` etc.</div><div>- Enriching the definition of `phone` and therefore `contact:phone` (because they mean the same): "If the `phone` key is mapped on an object with `amenity=telephone` then `phone` is the phone number of the telephone box and not the phone number of the operator."</div><div>- `phone` --> `contact:phone`</div><div>- `email` --> `contact:email`</div><div><br></div><div>Now the difficult part begins because no "mechanical edit" is possible (or at least very difficult and error-prone) here:</div><div>- `contact:website`: Only websites to be used for contacting purpose only (and having little or no information character).</div><div>- `website`: All the other websites of a POI not fitting in the definition of `contact:website`. So providing valuable information about the POI.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div><br></div><div>Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>-----Original Message-----</div><div><b>From</b>: Martin Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:Martin%20Koppenhoefer%20%3cdieterdreist@gmail.com%3e">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>></div><div><b>Reply-To</b>: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <<a href="mailto:%22Tag%20discussion,%20strategy%20and%20related%20tools%22%20%3ctagging@openstreetmap.org%3e">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>></div><div><b>To</b>: Cj Malone <<a href="mailto:Cj%20Malone%20%3cCjMalone@mail.com%3e">CjMalone@mail.com</a>></div><div><b>Cc</b>: <a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a></div><div><b>Subject</b>: Re: [Tagging] Remove non-prefixed versions of 'contact:' scheme</div><div><b>Date</b>: Mon, 11 May 2020 00:01:33 +0200</div><div><br></div><pre><br></pre><pre>sent from a phone</pre><pre><br></pre><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>On 10. May 2020, at 23:55, Cj Malone <</pre><a href="mailto:CjMalone@mail.com"><pre>CjMalone@mail.com</pre></a><pre>> wrote:</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>I think we should actively encourage more precise tags like</pre><pre>contact:phone when it's a contact number.</pre></blockquote><pre><br></pre><pre><br></pre><pre>why is this “more precise”? </pre><pre>What about even “more precise” tags, like</pre><pre>contact:phone:business_hours=</pre><pre>contact:phone:reservations=</pre><pre>even better?</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>IMHO dataconsumers find the tags easiest if they use the same key, if they have to search for the keys it will make everyone’s life harder not better.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>Cheers Martin </pre><pre>_______________________________________________</pre><pre>Tagging mailing list</pre><a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org"><pre>Tagging@openstreetmap.org</pre></a><pre><br></pre><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"><pre>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</pre></a><pre><br></pre><div><br></div></body></html>