<html><head></head><body>"Applies to<br><br>All  and  part of a relation tagged withtype=route and route=hiking or route=foot or route=bicycle or any other recreational route type." <br><br>I was thinking of route=piste, used for cross-country skiing or snowshoeing. I'd better leave out this part unless discussed in the context of other recreational routes. I don't see in the current proposal any showstopper, but who knows? <br>Once accepted, it will be easy enough to extend to other route=* relations as fit. <br>Yves <br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 20 mai 2020 13:33:26 GMT+02:00, Peter Elderson <pelderson@gmail.com> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr">Please review and comment on this proposal:<div><br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles</a> </div><div><br></div><div><table class="gmail-vcard" dir="ltr" style="font-size:14px;font-family:sans-serif;margin:2px 0px;background:rgb(238,238,238);border:1px solid rgb(170,170,170);padding:5px"><tbody><tr><th style="text-align:left">Definition:</th><td>specification of role values for members of a recreational route relation</td></tr></tbody></table></div><div><br></div><div>The status has changed to proposed as of today</div><div><br></div><div>Comments can be placed on the talk page and/or here. Please note that this proposal is meant to get a basic role set approved and documented. <br><div><br></div><div>Thanks for helping to finally get this done!</div></div><div><br></div><div>Best, Peter Elderson</div></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>