<html><head></head><body>Yeah, I've seen the pattern of route=piste for ways, I guess it is a case of newbies over-gardening.<br>Don't specifically exclude route=piste from your proposal: my point was to completely omit 'other recreational routes' if you don't master them to avoid unnecessary discussion.<br>When the proposal is accepted, you can have a look at taginfo and reach out to those route=* wiki page to inform that the new accepted proposal may be of interest. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 20 mai 2020 18:27:24 GMT+02:00, Peter Elderson <pelderson@gmail.com> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr">Thanks, I see that route=piste was approved and has its own role definition. Strangely enough, the tag is applied more often to ways then to relations, that does not seem to fit in the tag definition.<div><br><div>I meant the roles proposal to be generic, but I'll include the route=piste relation as an exception. Any other exceptions?<div><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Peter Elderson</div></div><br></div></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Op wo 20 mei 2020 om 17:37 schreef Yves <<a href="mailto:yvecai@mailbox.org">yvecai@mailbox.org</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>"Applies to<br><br>All  and  part of a relation tagged withtype=route and route=hiking or route=foot or route=bicycle or any other recreational route type." <br><br>I was thinking of route=piste, used for cross-country skiing or snowshoeing. I'd better leave out this part unless discussed in the context of other recreational routes. I don't see in the current proposal any showstopper, but who knows? <br>Once accepted, it will be easy enough to extend to other route=* relations as fit. <br>Yves <br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 20 mai 2020 13:33:26 GMT+02:00, Peter Elderson <<a href="mailto:pelderson@gmail.com" target="_blank">pelderson@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Please review and comment on this proposal:<div><br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles</a> </div><div><br></div><div><table dir="ltr" style="font-size:14px;font-family:sans-serif;margin:2px 0px;background:rgb(238,238,238);border:1px solid rgb(170,170,170);padding:5px"><tbody><tr><th style="text-align:left">Definition:</th><td>specification of role values for members of a recreational route relation</td></tr></tbody></table></div><div><br></div><div>The status has changed to proposed as of today</div><div><br></div><div>Comments can be placed on the talk page and/or here. Please note that this proposal is meant to get a basic role set approved and documented. <br><div><br></div><div>Thanks for helping to finally get this done!</div></div><div><br></div><div>Best, Peter Elderson</div></div>
</blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>