<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>May 25, 2020, 23:50 by fernando.trebien@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>then it depends<br></div><div>on whether the former railway has significance in some other less<br></div><div>obvious way (e.g. being part of an administrative boundary)<br></div></blockquote><div>This is going too far. Glaciers left clear marks in many countries, but<br></div><div>mapping glaciers of last glacial maximum[1] is out of scope of OSM.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If sole trace of railway is that administrative boundary matches its course,<br></div><div>then it should be deleted.<br></div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Glacial_Maximum">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Glacial_Maximum</a><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>