<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/5/20 9:49 pm, Peter Elderson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+utw+GGtPwx3XFAL1CYB9Le_Bu0G2p7NMZ+n5CDXHXrjw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Richard Fairhurst:</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
highway=mountain_path works for me for tagging mountain
paths.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Along that line, to retag all the unpaved highway=path's
in Nederland with something more specific, we would need at
least forest_path, dune_path, heath_path, grass_quai and
peat_path.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Umm highway=flat_path might be better :) And then there might be
a need for highway=hill_path ... :))</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>-----------------------------------------------------</p>
<p>For me highway=footway and highway=path without any other tags
are the same thing. Introducing yet another tag for similar
paths/footways may lead to more confused tagging of these things.
<br>
</p>
<p>I think the use of sub tags would lead to cleaner tagging. <br>
</p>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>