<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css"> #aqm-original DIV {
margin:0px;
} /* style */
</style>
<style type="text/css"> #aqm-original DIV {
margin:0px;
} /* style */
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto"><span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">On May 25, 2020 15:35:44 Jack Armstrong <jacknstacy@sprynet.com> wrote:</span></div><div id="aqm-original" style="color: black;"><div class="aqm-original-body"><div style="color: black;">
<blockquote type="cite" class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 0.75ex; border-left: 1px solid #808080; padding-left: 0.75ex;">
<div style="font-size: 13px;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">I agree with </span><span style="font-size: 13.333333015441895px;">Mateusz Konieczny. If there is some vestige of the object remaining, then mapping it in some way seems reasonable. But, if the railway, building, highway, etc., are completely removed and there are absolutely no visible remains of what was once there, it can be removed.</span><div style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13.333333015441895px;"><br></span></div><div style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13.333333015441895px;">I don't see the need to map something that does not actually exist.</span></div><div><br></div><div>- Jack Armstrong</div><div>chachafish</div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: medium;">I agree. OSM is not a historical object database. If it doesn't exist, it shouldn't be in the data.</span></div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">--</div><div dir="auto">Skyler</div></div> </div>
</div></body>
</html>