<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 27, 2020, at 6:42 AM, Volker Schmidt <<a href="mailto:voschix@gmail.com" class="">voschix@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="">This does not describe the situation<br class=""></div><ul class=""><li class=""><b class="">highway=footway</b> is "urban", implies foot=designated, usage can be expanded with tags like bicycle=yes|permisive||designated to describe mid-use ways<br class=""><br class=""></li><li class=""><b class="">highway=cycleway </b>implies bicycle=designated, usage can be widened with tags like foot=yes|permissive|designated to describe mixed-use ways (this<br class=""><br class=""></li><li class=""><b class="">path</b> is being used for two completly different things:</li></ul><div style="margin-left:80px" class="">(a) a "hiking" path, mostly in non-urban situations, including mountain hiking<br class=""></div><div style="margin-left:80px" class="">(b) with the additional tagging foot=designated plus bicycle=designated plus segregated=yes|no as a mixed use foot-cycle-way<br class=""></div><div style="margin-left:80px" class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">And there is (c) a non-urban trail with legal access for bicycles but in practice only usable with a mountain bike but lacking a MTB scale tag as the hiker, like me, who mapped it has no clue what MTB scale to put on it.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>