<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">27 maj 2020 kl. 06:54 skrev Yves <<a href="mailto:yvecai@mailbox.org" class="">yvecai@mailbox.org</a>>:</div><div class="">[…]<br class="">I'm as fool as you, and always mapped the paved, urban-style as highway=footway and the ones in the wilderness as highway =path. <br class=""><br class=""></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>So have I, and so have, as far as I can tell from the areas I am familiar with, most mappers in Sweden.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Not all of them, however, and given the current state of the Wiki, I can’t really say that those others are *wrong*.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>And if I draw a new way in JOSM, and then pick the preset which has the ”white walkers above white bicycle on a blue background” [1] icon, which is what I would do as a naïve mapper to map an urban cycleway (most of them are shared around here, to the annoyance of cyclists and pedestrians alike), I get highway=path, bicycle=designated, foot=designated.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>So, as I have said before, when rendering a map and faced with a highway=footway or highway=path I can always make an initial guess about how to render it, but I have to be prepared to consider at least *=designated, surface and width as well.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>[1] <a href="https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/Vagmarken/Pabudsmarken/Pabjuden-gang--och-cykelbana/" class="">https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/Vagmarken/Pabudsmarken/Pabjuden-gang--och-cykelbana/</a></div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div></body></html>