<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/5/20 8:01 am, Mateusz Konieczny
via Tagging wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:M8SIaOs--3-2@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>May 28, 2020, 23:54 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steveaOSM@softworkers.com">steveaOSM@softworkers.com</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div>"treed farmland" or "heavily wooded residential" prove
slightly problematic to OSM tagging.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Map tree-covered area (landuse=forest) and map farmland
(landuse=farmland) or<br>
</div>
<div>residential (landuse=residential).<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yes, the same area may be tree covered and residential at the
same time.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yes, "tree-covered area" meaning for landuse=forest
mismatches strict meanning<br>
</div>
<div>of bot landuse and forest.<br>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>I differ. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I would use natural=wood for the tree coverage. <br>
</p>
<p>Then there is no conflict with a landuse tag. <br>
</p>
<p>And natural=wood does mean tree covered ... and the key natural
incorporates 'non natural' i.e things altered or managed by man. </p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The key landuse should be to used describe the primary use of
land by humans, not the land cover but it's use. <br>
</p>
</body>
</html>