<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jun 4, 2020, 10:59 by f@zz.de:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div>Hi Mateusz,<br></div><div><br></div><div>On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:19:10PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>You can have forested military base with wetland (real case).<br></div><div><br></div><div>You can probably find military base (landuse=military) with landuse=farmland.<br></div><div><br></div><div>There are residential areas in forests, there are industrial zones in military bases,<br></div><div>there are railway areas in military bases.<br></div><div><br></div><div>etc etc<br></div><div><br></div><div>You will have overlapping areas or stuff like<br></div><div>landuse=military_industrial_area_under_tree_cover_with_intermittent_wetland<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If you have a residential area in a forest - Is that area used for<br></div><div>residential or for forestry purposes? <br></div></blockquote><div>Depends. Usually for one, rarely for both. "is it used for forestry" is<br></div><div>extremely hard to survey/guess and maintain that is why I do not<br></div><div>bother with tagging whatever something is used for forestry.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I am even unsure what is our tag for that (landuse=forestry?)<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div>Isnt that a landuse=residential with landcover=forest?<br></div></blockquote><div>Or, in more typical tagging landuse=residential and landuse=forest<br></div><div>on a separate areas.<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>IMHO a square meter has ONE predominant usage and thats what we tag.<br></div></blockquote><div>So you would not tag industrial sites/farmland inside military base,<br></div><div>even if mappable otherwise just because both are using landuse key?<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div> It<br></div><div>might be that there are trees in my backyard - still its a residential<br></div><div>area.<br></div></blockquote><div>In many cases this is true.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div> People try to map the trees and use landuse=forest for that but<br></div><div>thats simply broken.<br></div></blockquote><div>Why it is supposed to be broken? Are you considering<br></div><div>overlapping landuse=industrial in landuse=military<br></div><div>or natural=wood overlapping natural=wetland</div><div>or historic=castle sharing some area historic=church (on still visible ruins)<br></div><div>or leisure=pitch inside leisure=park as "simply broken"?<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>I have seen people map every single backyard with landuse=grass,<br></div><div>landuse=meadow, leisure=common or leisure=park which is completely bogus.<br></div><div>Its still a residential area its just grass growing there.<br></div></blockquote><div>landuse=grass in case of one being solely grass seems potentially correct<br></div><div>Other cases you mention seem unlikely to be correct in any real situation<br></div><div>(maybe also landuse=meadow, but it is stretching meaning of "backyard").<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>So i am still standing on the issue that there can only be ONE usage of<br></div><div>an area.<br></div></blockquote><div>Are you claiming that there are no cases of industrial areas within military bases?<br></div><div>And that there is not even one example of forest used both as military polygon<br></div><div>and for forestry?<br></div><div>And that there are no cases of pasture in area used for a forestry?<br></div><div><br></div><div>And anyway, we clearly have forested residential areas (natural=wood/landuse=forest<br></div><div>is for "forested area", not for some "active forestry use" anyway).<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div> but still landuse may not overlap landuse<br></div><div>and natural not natural. Its either a residential or miliary or<br></div><div>industrial or commercial or forest.<br></div></blockquote><div>Are you claiming that industrial sites in military bases are not existing?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Or are you claiming that we are not allowed to map it and we are supposed to<br></div><div>switch to landcover=military or something?<br></div><div><br></div><div>And that mapping natural=wetland is not OK inside natural=wood but is OK inside<br></div><div>landuse=forest?<br></div><div><br></div><div>and that natural=sinkhole is not mappable as area inside natural=wood/reef/shrub area, but<br></div><div>is mappable there as a node and as an area outside?<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>