<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jun 8, 2020, 15:05 by pla16021@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 13:32, brad <<a href="mailto:bradhaack@fastmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">bradhaack@fastmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div>I think it would be absurd to try to tag dangerous wildlife areas. It <br></div><div> would just be an enormous region for rattlesnakes and mountain lions in <br></div><div> the US. Same for grizzlys up north or snakes in the south. We have <br></div><div> signs warning of rodents carrying plague around here, should we tag that <br></div><div> too?<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The whole world is dangerous. Just label the entire planet as a hazard.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>railway=abandoned<br></div><div>hazard=tagging_discussions<br></div> </body>
</html>