<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jun 9, 2020, 13:55 by pla16021@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 04:08, Jarek Piórkowski <<a href="mailto:jarek@piorkowski.ca" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">jarek@piorkowski.ca</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><br></div><div>Yet we wouldn't map Watling Street in OSM with a way tagged as<br></div><div> roman_road=demolished nor roman_road=razed nor roman_road=abandoned<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Nope. We'd map the portions that are existing ways like this:<br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7063236" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7063236</a><br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>If it is mapping just still existing ways, why it has "conjectural=yes" tag?<br></div><div><br></div><div>For mapping of just still existing ways it seems to be suspiciously<br></div><div>well matching modern infrastructure like for example in<br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7063236#map=18/51.39839/0.45684">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7063236#map=18/51.39839/0.45684</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>In other words, it seems to be a clear case of mapping guessed route of formerm<br></div><div>historic no longer existing object.<br></div> </body>
</html>