<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
I mean physically. If a vehicle can't use it legally, the access key
must be activated, like in any other feature.<br>
I believe that the legality of circulation shouldn't interfere with
the tagging of a track. For example: a dirt highway in a Natural
Reserve should be always a track, regardless of who can use it. If
it's only for rangers or emergency vehicles, there are tags to
reflect that. If only bikes or hikers can use it, then it's a path.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Às 13:56 de 10/06/2020, Mike Thompson
escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALJoUktXjpaBUmyNAAbuZ4TaXi587hkPSUY23J4tpbjaJW-vqg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<br>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:26 AM António Madeira <<a
href="mailto:antoniomadeira@gmx.com" moz-do-not-send="true">antoniomadeira@gmx.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
> If a motor vehicle can and uses the way, it's a track.<br>
<br>
<div>When you say "can use" do you mean both legally and
physically, or only physically?. If legally, do you mean just
the general public? As someone pointed out, law enforcement
has access to almost everything via motor vehicle. Also, the
land manager (e.g. parks and recreation department) has access
to almost all of their properties via motor vehicle.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
Does this only apply to unpaved ways? </div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>