<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/6/20 11:12 pm, Paul Allen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOKdCR1pbAaOV3H5fbJhfMBsbCPmdE4=KL3JQfrZrtpBbg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 02:13, Warin <<a
href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>On 9/6/20 9:30 pm, Paul Allen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">From those, it appears that the condition
is free-form text except for cases
<div class="gmail_quote">like opening hours.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Opening_hours provides for free form text.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>I expressed my point unclearly. It appears from the
examples that the</div>
<div>condition is free-form text. However, when the condition
specifies<br>
</div>
<div>opening hours then those hours should be expressed in the
standard</div>
<div>form for opening_hours. That opening_hours allows
free-form text is</div>
<div>a digression. Unless you were seriously suggesting that
we</div>
<div>abuse opening_hours as a way of introducing free-form
text into</div>
<div>a condition even though it appears (to me, at least) that
conditions</div>
<div>permit free-form text anyway.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>? Abuse opening_hours by 'introducing' free form text? It is
allowed, so not an introduction nor an abuse. <br>
</p>
<p>I was not aware that condition allowed free form text. Both tags
are poorly documented for this on the wiki. <br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOKdCR1pbAaOV3H5fbJhfMBsbCPmdE4=KL3JQfrZrtpBbg@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Do you concur that a conditional such as "(low water)" is
permissible? If</div>
<div>so, do you agree that it is a better solution than
"seasonal" or "intermittent"?</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Yes, I think so, but the documentation for free form text is not
clear. Is open_hours better? I don't know. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOKdCR1pbAaOV3H5fbJhfMBsbCPmdE4=KL3JQfrZrtpBbg@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>Using "seasonal" is unhelpful because low water is
possible (if unlikely)</div>
<div>during all seasons. Using "intermittent" is somewhat
better.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>But both "seasonal" and "intermittent" are (currently)
only defined as</div>
<div>applying to water(ish) features themselves, not to things
that are under</div>
<div> those features. Changes would have to be made to
routers to allow</div>
<div>either seasonal or intermittent to be interpreted
correctly when applied</div>
<div>to ways. Routers already (I hope) interpret
conditionals.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p> Some roads are closed in winter but this could be applied as
either seasonal or conditional depending on the mapper. <br>
</p>
<p>I think I have tagged some but cannot recall which way I did it.
<br>
</p>
<p>Would be usefull to do a tag info search for the more popular one
and then document it on the wiki. <br>
</p>
</body>
</html>