<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jun 21, 2020, 09:05 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 21. Jun 2020, at 03:02, Joseph Guillaume <josephguillaume@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>It would be like mapping every fountain as historic.<br></div><div><br></div><div>They're often not considered of historic interest locally, let alone nationally or internationally.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Hope this clarifies my thinking...<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>you are raising the bar higher than it is. Every memorial is tagged as historic for example. Historic is a key like any other. Maybe historic=yes has a requirement for some significance (eg amenity=fountain historic =yes), but there isn’t for historic=x, eg there aren’t memorials that don’t “deserve” historic=memorial<br></div></blockquote><div>It may be desirable to avoid repeat of historic=wayside_shrine failure where due to lack of alternative<br></div><div>it is widely used to tag modern shrines and ones that are not beside a road<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>