<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 9, 2020, 23:58 by pla16021@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 22:36, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 9, 2020, 20:38 by <a target="_blank" href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">pla16021@gmail.com</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><div>Maybe not ideal, but if you're looking for an immediate solution then<br></div><div>access=customers and access=private?<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>I like it, but it is a bit tricky as I can walk into many offices without being<br></div><div>a customer (though typically it is done as someone wants or<br></div><div>considers being one).<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>"Customers" is rather broad, though. I think some of us apply<br></div><div>access=customers to church car parks. Then again, one could argue they're<br></div><div>buying after-life insurance. If I walk into a shop and look around then<br></div><div>walk out without buying anything, does that mean I wasn't a customer<br></div><div>in the OSM sense? <br></div><div><br></div><div>I take "customers" to mean "non-employees who may access the<br></div><div>facility because of interactions with the controlling organization." Not<br></div><div>staff. Private means that nobody but staff (excepting emergency<br></div><div>services, plumbers who have been called in to deal with a problem,<br></div><div>etc.) have access.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Good point, I also used access=customers for churchgoers-only parking lot.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div><br></div><div>Though access=private seems perfectly fine to mark office as internal<br></div><div>to a company (or covering restricted set of clients).<br></div></div></blockquote></div><div class=""><br></div><div class="">If there are restrictions on who may be a client, then it's more of<br></div><div class="">access=designated, or opening hours with "appointment required" or<br></div><div class="">some such.<br></div><div class=""><br></div><div class="">I think we can handle these things with existing tagging. A bit clunky,<br></div><div class="">but it can be done. Is it worth doing it more explicitly for the sake of<br></div><div class="">carto or overpass queries? I haven't given it enough thought to<br></div><div class="">say one way or the other on more explicit handling.<br></div></div></blockquote><div>I was thinking mostly about other mappers, access tag on office<br></div><div>may be a bit unclear in the intended meaning.<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>