<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 21, 2020, 10:18 by email@daniel-korn.de:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hi,<br></div><div><br></div><div>the wiki [1] states for riverbanks that<br></div><div><br></div><div>"These water areas should be tagged as either of waterway=riverbank OR natural=water + water=river."<br></div><div><br></div><div>Why do we need both variants and why don't we just say that waterway=riverbank is preferred?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers<br></div><div>dktue<br></div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=riverbank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=riverbank</a><br></div></blockquote><div>Because both schemes have some support. iD is muddling things with their<br></div><div>pushing of "tag upgrades" without explaining to user what is happening,<br></div><div>so it is quite hard to say how many mappers prefer each scheme.<br></div><div><br></div><div>But almost certainly, like with phone and contact:phone, there is no support to<br></div><div>deprecate either one.<br></div> </body>
</html>